Saturday 16 November
We loaded up this morning with pumps, hoses, brushcutters, tools etc. ready to tackle the flooded bridges. What a disappointment 😞, the drains had worked and the bridges were dry, just a bit of sweeping up and leaf removal. That put us ahead of schedule for looking at the 6ft drain at Toddington Station. This situation didn't last long; as we left Laverton Bridge a local resident told us about a surface cover that had lifted out with the floodwater pressure. We stopped off to replace the lid and ended up clearing the end of the drain. Next a quick stop at the Aqueduct on the way back down and then to Toddington to check for a blockage in the drain through the station.
First stop Bridge 16, Didbrook No 2, we swept up the leaves as that was all that was left of the 7' of water that was here on Thursday.
|
Bridge 16, Didbrook 2, no flood! |
|
Culvert 16A overflow still running |
|
The top 2" of this marker board was all that was visible on Thursday |
Stopped at Bridge 8 on the Broadway road to check the cess, needless to say the flood water had soaked away.
|
Stanton - Bridge 8 northwards |
|
Stanton - Bridge 8 Southwards |
|
Down side fields below Bridge 8 the source of the most of the flood |
Next stop Laverton, Bridge 6, this was over 5' deep on Thursday, but we had cleared the gullies the week before.
|
Bridge 6 Laverton, no flooding, gullies working |
|
Bridge 6 down side, high mileage end, silt trap |
|
Bridge 6 low mileage silt trap |
|
Roger and Dave clearing up the remnants of the flood |
The signage on these bridges is quite explicit, it says 'ROAD CLOSED FLOOD' and the depth marker shows the level.
|
Flood sign Bridge 6, up side |
Evidently it's not quite enough information for some drivers, this tanker was spotted on Friday afternoon under the bridge and it left on Saturday when it was pulled out, just before we arrived.
|
What bit of CLOSED is ambiguous then! (Photo: John Balderstone) |
|
Image: Peter Darley |
|
The only evidence we found of the tanker was the wheel marks |
|
3" pump deployed to clear the north silt trap |
|
Dave and Michael sweeping the road |
|
How deep was it? |
As we were packing our kit a gentleman stopped to talk to us about the tanker incident, he had photographed it for the local paper, one of his images is above. He told us that a surface cover had been lifted off by the flood water further up the lane towards Wormington. We said we'd pop round and replace it.
|
Surface cover lifted out by flood water |
|
Surface cover back in it's correct place, eventually |
We noticed water bubbling up in the verge just beyond the cover, sure sign of a burst pipe and possible blockage. This pipe take the gully drain flow from Bridge 6, we piled out to investigate.
|
Water bubbling up in the verge |
|
Michael rods in from the outfall |
|
Dave clearing rubbish to establish a flow along the ditch |
|
Drain flowing again |
|
Burst subsiding |
It's well off our area, so we will try to find out who is responsible for fixing it.
On the way back to Toddington we stopped at the Aqueduct (Bridge 9) as we'd had a report from a hiker that the inlet was over topping and the path was disintegrating.
|
Arrival at Bridge 9 |
|
Leaves in the grille, the level has dropped a bit |
|
a deep hole in the path, but hardly disintegrating! |
|
Roger rakes the leaves away |
|
Dave tackles the inlet end |
|
Now flowing from the outlet |
There's evidence of washout in the cess at the toe, nothing too drastic but something to watch.
|
Washout around the down side pier |
|
Channel drain needs clearing |
|
Back to normal level |
|
Some flow on the low mileage side form the crest |
|
Vegetation cut back so we can see what's going on |
We have known about the problems with the grille since early this year, other jobs have always taken a higher priority. We may just remove it until we can get a better grille fabricated.
The cess at Toddington Station was full at the south end and lower at the north end on Thursday indicating that there may be a blockage just up from the footbridge. Firstly we had a look at Stow Road Bridge to see what the run off from the road had done.
|
Cess water drained away leaving some silt |
|
Check in the cess in the 6' revealed a strange looking pipe |
|
the chamber under the troughing needs to be cleared |
|
Layers of clay exposed by the run off |
In the up side there's an extra pipe running in on the corner of the catchpit, we found it was from the water crane on Platform 1.
|
The eagle eyed team investigating |
|
Test of the crane catcher |
Back in the cess we dropped some dye into a chamber to see which way the flow goes, it's not obvious from the surface.
|
Strange working near civilisation |
|
Start point int he 6' |
|
Dye added (pictured from the other side 😉) |
|
Watching for chambers turning green |
|
It flows southbound |
|
Right down to the barrow crossing and beyond |
|
Starting to rod the section suspected to be blocked |
There's definitely a blockage, we rodded from both ends and the rods overlapped, the obstrucion seems to be soft clay but it's not clear where it came from.
|
Rods laid on the surface, 6m overlap |
|
Soft grey clay! |
When we set out each morning, we guess what kit we will need for the day. Most days we have an idea what we are going to do, some, like today, it's more hit and hope for what we load on. One thing is for certain, we always leave out something we need later in the day 😟
|
Prepared for the unexpected |
That wouldn't be one of D.C. Merrett's tankers by any chance? Can't laugh too much though, as I marooned my milk van on Friday morning....but the water was only 8 - 9 inches deep!
ReplyDeleteAndy P.
I can't comment on the owner of the tanker as I issued a PO last week for some jetting work to the same company! The tractor unit was written off :-( Stu
DeleteIn the picture of "Test of the crane catcher" the pipe below the water flow is the feed to the water crane. The feed from the tank runs along the back of platform two under the road bridge across the track back under the bridge to the crane on platform one.
ReplyDeleteNeal
Hi Neal, Thanks for confirming that, I think we can see the pipe crossing the chamber in the 6' at the end of P2. Stu
DeleteIt does just occur to me that the tanker (driver) may not have had an alternative route to avoid the flooded bridge and having a schedule to keep just decided to risk it.
ReplyDeleteIt is also surprising how many times I pass flood notices on the roads only to discover there is no flood; there may have been but because no one bothers to remove the signs, the signs lose their authority and get ignored. No excuse for ignoring the depth measure at the bridge.
Another gripping saga "Where is Charlie fishing today - Paul?"
(You would need to be at least 60 for this comment to mean anything!)
Powli Wilson